Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuente de la Plaza Nueva, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 50-52 HDR.jpg

File:Fuente de la Plaza Nueva, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 50-52 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2020 at 16:51:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Night view of the baroque Turjak Fountain with the Ljubljana Castle in the background, Ljubljana, Slovenia. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 19:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality for a night shot. Cmao20 (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support one step back and the shot would have been even better (fountain circle would have not been cropped). --Ivar (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but needs a lot of noise reduction work e.g. just above the trees and around the flag. Charles (talk) 08:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles: Done Poco a poco (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Would prefer blue hour, the contrast is just too much. The view is nice, but not spectacular. Technically fine. —kallerna (talk)
Kallerna: I've reduced the contrast a bit Poco a poco (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to judge the composition as presented, rather than asking for a blue hour photo. —kallerna! Still OK to oppose of course on contrast and 'not spectacular'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

blue hour is part of composition. It can make for a more pleasant image - Benh (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 11:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, blue hour would have been nice but I think this image allows the veil effect with the fountain while at the same time avoiding the problem of too many unavoidably blown highlights to give us a nice feel for this place in the genuine nighttime hours as opposed to twilight or longer-exposure false twilight. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 19:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Fountains