Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Wall of China July 2006.JPG

File:Great Wall of China July 2006.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2010 at 21:38:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Nicolas M. Perrault - uploaded by Nicolas M. Perrault - nominated by Nicolas M. Perrault -- Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 23:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sky and background could use darkening and more contrast to my taste. --McIntosh Natura (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quality imo not good enough, sorry --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be a little more specific concerning the quality of the image? Is it the exposition, the composition or the number of pixels that troubles you?

Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, bland composition, overexposed clouds and rather unsharp. Far away from being of FP quality, in my opinion. --Aqwis (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite unsharp and not nice colors. Athyllis (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMO now, a "support" vote in FPC cannot be "weak", because it is FPC. Then I cannot support, because it would be a weak support, sorry...--Jebulon (talk) 17:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Take it this way: there are good FPCs and there are better FPCs. The quality varies upon different FPCs. If you think that this is FPC quality, even if it's a among the lowest FPCs, then you can vote with weak support. Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose overexposed sky, background a little blurred Cathy Richards (talk) 17:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- The Thunder Chimp (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]