Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grell by Janke - Black and white.jpg

File:Grell by Janke - Black and white.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 20:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Rettinghaus - uploaded by Rettinghaus - nominated by Rettinghaus -- Rettinghaus (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rettinghaus (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 23:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. 20 upper 08:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good reproduction of a good lithograph from a good photograph. --Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "created by" should really be "A. Janke after Gustav Schauer", then the rest you. Given it's right on the file page, it's not a huge deal, though. Not a big fan of the "reduce it to black and white" approach, but it has its place. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. --Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, on second consideration, I think if you're going to modify the colours, it needs to be presented as a modified copy, linking to the original. There's no sign it was modified or how on the file page, which is an

Oppose for me. I guess I can fix that myself, and I have, but it just... I dunno. It feels like the whole voting was kinda under false pretenses that this is what it looked like originally, when it isn't. Also, some fairly easy restoration that hasn't happened. I dunno, I don't want to gatekeep things, but it does feel... misleading. If people want to vote for things knowing they've been modified, that's... different than if it's presented as an original version. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might be nice if we could replace the white background with a clear one, though. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: If the admins will forgive a quick informational comment: That would require a PNG, not a JPEG, which means it'd show up blurry in uses. JPEGs don't have a transparency option. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men