Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Itsukushima Gate.jpg

File:Itsukushima Gate.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2014 at 03:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JordyMeow - uploaded by JordyMeow - nominated by JordyMeow -- Jordy Meow (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jordy Meow (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 03:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks oversaturated. Certainly the colours are not natural. Saffron Blaze (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support The wooden structure is probably painted so yes, colours are not natural. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 08:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors are of course good for me. Halavar (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong tilt and very small resolution for a static object. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Julian, if those points are resolved, I will support. Weak support--DXR (talk) 19:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ per others. --Kadellar (talk) 14:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral --Kadellar (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Julian, I fixed those issues, tell me if it is fine. Jordy Meow (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That's definitely a lot better now, thanks. Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support thank you for the improvements! -- Sputniktilt (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The red channel is quite strongly overexposed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The comments from "support" reviews that disregard this concern are doing the FPC project a real disservice. The sky and water are compltely unrealistic and the red literally glows on the screen it is so overdone. 131.137.245.206 17:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is unrealistic about the sky? Is it unrealistic because it is cyan? Believe it or not, sometimes sky really is cyan. I suggest you to spend more time observing nature. All the colors are there, even the most "unrealistic". Even the glowing red in direct sunlight. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ 1. Not taken in an ideal lighting. The red colour is too strong in shadows. 2. I prefer a low tide view which will give more idea about the subject. 3. Even on high tide, I see some better possibilities. ~~4. Bare minimum resolution. Even though I respect photographer's right to save the high resolution files and still fighting for it, I don't recommend featuring such versions.~~ J e e 03:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JordyMeow. J e e 05:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The background is distracting. There are better images of this monument in Category:Itsukushima-jinja torii. The size is quite small. Yann (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background. I suspect the red channel was is blown due to the strong midday winter sun on the paint. The saturation/vibrance has been boosted in Lightroom, according to the EXIF, which seems unnecessary. BTW, IP 131.137.245.206, if you are seeing glowing red rather than orange then it is very likely you are viewing this on a wide colour gamut monitor set to e.g., AdobeRGB. Unless viewed in a properly colour-managed app like Lightroom/Photoshop then reds can glow too much. -- Colin (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Yann. --Karelj (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 09:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings