Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jerusalem Dome of the rock BW 14.JPG

File:Jerusalem Dome of the rock BW 14.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2010 at 23:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Berthold Werner - uploaded by Berthold Werner - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info Many annotations and interesting links on the descriptions page, even a non conform extensions name--Jebulon (talk) 23:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info|usedin= used on 165 pages in 95 wikis (without commons), TinEye finds 21 copies in the web [1]

Oppose Poor composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deserves to be QI but the composition is a bit too straight forward for me. --AngMoKio (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please use the file extension jpg in the lower-case next time. I think that it is common sense and good practice that images candidates here should follow the guidelines. The only file extensions recommended for photographs by commons are jpg and jpeg; see Commons:First_steps/Quality_and_description#Format_guidance. Further, the first steps guidelines on commons refers to language wikis for formatting guidelines; see Commons:First steps/Upload form, which directly links to en:Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Image_titles_and_file_names (I see that this image is shown on several articles on the English wiki and a number of other language wikis). The en wiki clearly indicates that the file extensions in the lower case (jpg) are recommended there, and the en wiki says "For uniformity, lower case file name extensions are recommended." Snowmanradio (talk) 12:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I really appreciate your attempt to enforce consistent file extensions, but don't you think such a message would be better placed on the uploader's talk page? --Dschwen (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My comment is to provide information on the guidelines in case the author is not aware of the recommendations. It does not imply an enforcement. The comment is relevant to this image and its FPC, so I think this is an appropriate place for such a comment. I would be interested to hear from the author. Snowmanradio (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I use lowercase letters for the extension since some months. Older uploads have uppercase letters. :-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support PogoEngel (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition. --Karel (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]