Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Juvenile Erinaceus europaeus kallerna.JPG

File:Juvenile Erinaceus europaeus kallerna.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2009 at 09:21:11

Info created by kallerna - uploaded by kallerna - nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 09:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 09:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBeautiful creature, well photographed. I love all the other shots of this little one as well :) Julielangford (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the animal in its natural environment. The hands are too distracting too. Yann (talk) 16:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But then you don't have scale for the size. —kallerna™ 09:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ideally it would be on grass, or something similar, but a hedgehog is a wild animal, and they do interact with us humans, as we are part of their environment, so I think this is still a true representation of a wild animal, in a wild environment [they really like our gardens]. Sometimes captive images can also be extrememly valuable for people to use. A good quality captive shot will outdo a bad quality wild shot any day IMO. Julielangford (talk) 11:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality is great, the spikes in particular are extremely sharp. But I really dislike the composition with the hands and I also think the image is a little too bright. -- JovanCormac 17:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agree that the hands act as a useful scale. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeTechnical quality is ok although DOF could be higher, especially if you control the subject like this. Hands occlude the subject too much. Scene looks to unnatural. Picture lacks wow and artistic merit. --Dschwen (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The dirty thumbnail in foreground is seen even in thumbnail and looks very unpleasant.--Two+two=4 (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 20:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]