Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kampen, Molenbrug. 28-02-2022. (actm.) 03.jpg

File:Kampen, Molenbrug. 28-02-2022. (actm.) 03.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2022 at 15:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
Info Kampen, Molenbrug (suspended cable-stayed bridge) over the IJssel. (southeast side)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This could do with some additional sharpening IMO. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support May be a touch too warm. --XRay 💬 16:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. Would you like me to make the photo a little colder?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Perfectly good QI, but a straightforward presentation and no great composition to me, and in terms of the image, the most interesting element to me is what I guess is the water level meter that looks like it measures how far the water is from the bridge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An ordinary bridge with featureless sky in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special about this bridge. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The latticework of the cables might make something interesting if handled differently, but not in this image. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight crop at the leftmost cable stay. Otherwise like the composition. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 08:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]