Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koneshwarama Temple, détails de la façade (4).jpg

File:Koneshwarama Temple, détails de la façade (4).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2016 at 21:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Détails de la façade du Koneshwarama Temple.-Trinquemalay, Province de l'Est au Sri Lanka.-

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by, uploaded and nominated by User:PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ.--Pierre André (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work for me. The dark space at right, and the ground, with the stacks of whatever they are, take attention away from the artworks/frames/lights. It just looks a bit messy overall. INeverCry 03:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is actually a wall adjacent to the main entrance of the temple, which occupies the dark space on the right. For information on the ground are stacked building elements needed for the restoration in progress, the entrance to the sanctuary.--Pierre André (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - I found them an interesting element of the composition, but chacun à son gout. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per INC. Good colors but the image is too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting,maybe a crop on the right --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per INC. — Julian H.^✈ 07:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful but not exceptional enough for FP. -- Colin (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]