Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kranensee Wien-Aspern Seestadt-DSC 3676w.jpg

File:Kranensee Wien-Aspern Seestadt-DSC 3676w.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2014 at 22:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P e z i (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support technisch nicht perfekt aber das Bild hat einen Wow-Faktor. --Ralf Roleček 23:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love the colors, but the composition just comes across as too random. For this sort of thing a video might work better (but then of course it has copyright issues). As it is I can't tell from the image alone that the cranes are performing a ballet. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support —레비 Revi 08:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quality ain't good enough. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally added "s" instead of "o". Now fixed. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As Daniel: Colors are nice, but the composition and motive do not work for me. The crop at the right seems very random to me. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I understand that the motion blur is necessary to convey the sense of movement of the crane arms, but the verticals are out of focus too. Sorry, but not convinced about the composition or quality. --DAJF (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose Nice image, but the lights are very bright and there is a big dark area at the bottom. --XRay ^talk 16:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Huh what??? I could just oppose by looking at the picture on the FPC page alone. That's how bad it is. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, thats nothing like blurry cranes (I’m not talking about the motion, but there’s nothing in focus) and overexposed lights. Nothing special at all. No idea what that picture wants to tell me. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose No. —Blurred Lines 17:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 12:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]