Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leitura by Jose Ferraz de Almeida Júnior 1892.jpg

File:Leitura by Jose Ferraz de Almeida Júnior 1892.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2015 at 14:32:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Reading, by José Ferraz de Almeida Júnior, oil on carvas, 1892. Located currently in Pinacoteca do Estado de São Paulo. Created and uploaded by The Photographer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish, I want more, more paintings! -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK, but I can't check the reproduction of the original colors.--XRay ^talk 16:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay: For original colors, see File:Almeida Júnior - Leitura.jpg. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO you can compare with the original painting only, not with a digital copy. Please have a look to the version history, the colors vary always. --XRay ^talk 18:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay: Oh yes! But this Wilfredo's version is much better. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay: I don´t know what original colors is, however, if you want, you could download the RAW file (see image description) and try revelate it by yourself and show us. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem. It is difficult to compare for this kind of picture. But: Your image is really good, you got a support vote.--XRay ^talk 04:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay: I thought that reality is one, like truth, but everyone has their own interpretation. I was present in front of the original painting, but my revealed, is just my visual interpretation of the colors present and not the original colors. If you can provide some way to get the original colors from the RAW file, it would be very important. The support vote is not important to me, but to learn to get those original colors. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support · Favalli ⟡ 01:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]