Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Line scan photo of nine car BART C1 train in 2017.jpg

File:Line scan photo of nine car BART C1 train in 2017.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2018 at 01:03:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 01:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 01:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Yann (talk) 06:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Because of the line mentioned below. Please ping me if corrected. Yann (talk) 11:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The motif isn't that interesting to me, but the achievement is extraordinary and deserves acknowledgement by getting an FP designation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question There is a line across the whole length of the train, in the region of the middle of the windows, what is that? It doesn't look like part of the train, more likely something on the lens? --cart-Talk 08:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a sensor defect. The same line can be seen, albeit in a more subtle way, in File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017, car 01.png, which was taken with a different lens. It intersects the windows on the doors. I've also blown at the sensor with a dust blower, to no avail. I'll try to remove this artifact using software postprocessing. dllu (t,c) 22:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The resolution is really impressive, but this line really ruins the image. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really want to try slit scan photo when I see this. - Benh (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral If the sensor artifact can be removed, I could support. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose size --Mile (talk) 08:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is this a reason for opposing? We want the FP images on Commons to be as good as possible, no?--Peulle (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beeing useful is one of them. I doubt format 40:1 is magical for showing, especialy when summary starts with "Warning". --Mile (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mile, this is not a valid reason to oppose and is disruptive and harmful to the project. We are a repository of images. That you haven't figured out where the Zoom viewer link is yet, is your problem. Here is 50% size 26.7MP. Did you know that warning message used to be used on any picture > 2000px high (i.e. 6MP) and the Template:LargeImage current recommendation is 50MP, which some cameras produce natively. Technology moves on, Commons slowly develops a better UI and browsers get better. Let's not start placing silly restrictions on max image size at FP. -- Colin (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Techincally is good shot (with some vertical lines in black part - scaned), with low usefulness. Trainspotter would like more normal picture, for instance check Kaberllager train shots. Dont know where is this going, with MPx, i love 2007 FP shots much more than 2017. I dont have so fast link, treat me like avarage Wiki user (Common user), in this case we have problems to see. --Mile (talk) 11:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mile, the Commons UI could be greatly improved. It should be easier than fiddling with URLs to get versions of the image at 50% size or any size. But we are stuck with offering the image at 1280xNNN max size offered or else full size. The zoom viewer is always available even on modestly large images (e.g. 24MP) though sometimes the tool is broken. If you have difficulty viewing images then please complain to WMF and encourage the community to demand better web site. It is absolutely not the fault of any photographer here that they create large images. Elsewhere on the web, people are taking and uploading gigapixel images and 3D interactive videos and Commons is still stuck with opening the JPG full size in a browser. On Commons FP, we really shouldn't be concerned with the Commons UI making it hard for anyone with a slow link to appreciate a photo. Even the slowest link can use the Zoom viewer. -- Colin (talk) 11:13, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Cart, Uoaei1, and Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support respect! --Neptuul (talk) 22:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please fix the image sensor problem and I will support right now --The Photographer 11:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - until that line is fixed. Please ping me if corrected. Or you could withdraw this nomination and re-nominate it when the photo is fixed and up to FP standard to get a fresh start. --cart-Talk 09:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Per cart--Ermell (talk) 08:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm working on new denoising methods for getting rid of the vertical lines (especially in the blue cars) and I have implemented automatic removal of the sensor artifact. However, I won't be able to upload the image before this FPC closes. I'll upload the new image tonight or tomorrow. dllu (t,c) 22:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 13:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]