Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lophophanes cristatus Luc Viatour 2.jpg
File:Lophophanes cristatus Luc Viatour 2.jpg, featured edit
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2009 at 20:55:17
- Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support--Avala (talk) 21:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour: how do you do? Your images are amazing. I actually think this one could be the Picture of the Year. Calandrella (talk) 21:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support--Georgez (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. →Diti the penguin — 22:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose A very nice composition but the image is a bit noisy and unsharp. Compare pixels to File:Gymnopithys-leucaspis-002.jpg (admittedly an unusually sharp image, but I would like to see Wikimedia/pedia exceed their current standards) Tomfriedel (talk) 23:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- L'exemple est trop accentué et la lumière du flash est franchement moche, rien a voir avec la lumière naturelle du couché de soleil sur ma photo ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Translation: “The example is too marked and the flashlight is frankly ugly, nothing to do with the natural sunlight on my [Luc Viatour's] photo ;)” →Diti the penguin — 23:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Je suis d'accord avec Luc, la lumière sur l'oiseau est très belle. A strong mitigating reason (comment on dit ça en français?) to forget the slight noise -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot. Great light. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Tomascastelazo --Simonizer (talk) 00:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Why are there no camera properties such as shutter speed or ISO settings with this photo? Tomfriedel (talk) 04:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Je teste un logiciel raw en phase de développement. Ce qui explique la disparition des exifs. Je viens de corriger les exifs sont là. --Luc Viatour (talk) 08:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXXtalk 08:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support beautiful lighting - lovely composition - very n(o)ice :-) --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Lycaon (talk) 23:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support Interesting, the lighting is great --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna™ 16:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support well done. — Aitias // discussion 06:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Chrumps (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Christoph.fr (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)