Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mamão papaia em fundo preto.jpg

File:Mamão papaia em fundo preto.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2015 at 14:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info all by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
Support -- RTA 14:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good colours, good contrast. Good as an illustration. --Tremonist (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but posterization between the fruits and the reflection cut not like --LivioAndronico talk 17:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about the use of English [...]

- Sorry, could re-write Livioandronico2013 ? -- RTA 17:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - entre os frutos que parece posterized também reflete bem cortadas não gosto --LivioAndronico talk 17:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I live a note --LivioAndronico talk 17:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - So, "Sorry, but I do not like the posterization between the fruits and the reflection" ?? That's it? If it's it okay, have some "posterization", not much on the reflection, but on the back fruit. On the reflection is the black perspex darking the fruit. You can write in Italian for me, bello ;). -- RTA 17:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Maybe you must Re-read--LivioAndronico talk 17:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        No... that is not English and this is not Portuguese also. I'm saying that you cold write in Italian, if you wish so, because I can read. It is correct "Sorry, but I do not like the posterization between the fruits and the reflection" ?
        
        And that's the sRGB 8 bits problem, the ProPhoto 16 bits do not have this JPEG artefact, I will re-upload this. -- RTA 18:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed -- RTA 18:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Undoubtedly better. However continues don't like me the cut of reflection so for me it is neutral--LivioAndronico talk 19:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Now I get @Livioandronico2013: , well, I was improving that before I saw your answer; the problem is that in the original file have some water between the perplex and the fruit, because of previous shoots with water drops (that end it up not a good idea for this one), so have a flat and weird cut because of the water, also Fixed. -- RTA 19:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support well done although I would expect a little more sharpness from a studio shot. --Code (talk) 04:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DOF is to low. Sorry but f/5 for a macro shoot is not enought for a good DOF. Please use the focus stacking technique or use f/10 or better f/16 for this kind of shoots. Otherwise nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Alchemist-hp what the fuck are you talking about? This is the result of 22 images stacked, this is a papaya, it's soft... and for the others, this is the original colour, not a touch in saturation, check the google if you do not know about the subject before say things like that The Photographer and Colin... -- RTA 12:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Aha, and where can I read it: "This is the result of 22 images stacked"??? DOF is still to low for me or the sharpness isn't ok. Please take a look to one of my macro images too. Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - This is not a macro photo... and I don't have time for a "I'm better then you"... I already told you that this is a soft fruit, will not be crisp as this, and that is maximum that I can extract from my equipment, this is not a 5D II with a 100mm, it is a Kiss X7 with a 125 USD lens... And Be-140g.jpg it's not a flawless technique also... -- RTA 18:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Hi RTA, my "old" image: Be-140g.jpg isn't an FP image ;-) OK!? Your image is a very nice image, but simply not FP for me. Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        Heinrich, this already get, I was just saying that you was wrong about me not knowing about the technique... just that... Anyway, peace!-- RTA 18:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - RTA, mind your words. You are expected to stay mellow even if people criticize your work. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - When people say things that makes no sense Yann, why should why stay cool about it?? For politics? -- RTA 18:08, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Courtesy, decency, cordiality and good faith is the secret to turn this environment into a place of peace, cooperation and support of all of us that after all we are brothers. --The Photographer (talk) 18:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That coming from you, HEHEHEHEHEE, okay... V -- RTA 19:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Satured, focus problem peer Alchemist-hp --The Photographer (talk) 11:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional enough for FP. Low in detail/sharpness and looks too saturated. -- Colin (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality issues. Kruusamägi (talk) 05:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]