Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Wörth Pfarrkirche hll. Primus und Felizian und Rosenkranzkirche ONO-Ansicht 06052019 6767.jpg

File:Maria Wörth Pfarrkirche hll. Primus und Felizian und Rosenkranzkirche ONO-Ansicht 06052019 6767.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2019 at 06:59:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 07:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The left and right crops feel a little arbitrary to me, as one cuts off a staircase and the other, a house. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. But I only had the 70-200mm lens mounted. In position 70mm. And I was on top of a ship, that was moving towards the subjects. Sorry! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could at least crop out the rest of that house on the right, though that doesn't address the problems with the left crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice juxtaposition of the three towers and I don't mind the crop; the cut elements are too small in frame. – Lucas 08:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tower-church-church works well. But surely the tower has a name too that could be added to the description. Crop is fine, cropping out the house on the right would give the church (and final house) too little space and unbalance the image. --Cart (talk) 10:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 11:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Vulp here 13:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice!--BoothSift 22:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 00:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I dissent. The crops left and right disturb me too much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support something to the right might be a bit more balanced.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support although the light is not optimal --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support knowing the location with the vantage point on the water I find it (mainly in the context of Wikipedia) a bit misleading to not include at least a bit of the water. Still a nice picture. C-M (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 11:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish the sky was better, but the angle is great all the same. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful cloudy sky. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings