Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marrus orthocanna NOAA.jpg

File:Marrus orthocanna NOAA.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2013 at 12:08:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Kevin Raskoff (NOAA) - uploaded & nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Like Commons:Overwriting existing files, I propose a HD, restored and cropped version of File:Marrus orthocanna.jpg.
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! Poco a poco (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the crop a bit unbalanced (too much space at left?) compared to File:Marrus orthocanna crop.jpg? J Kadavoor J e e 13:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting --The Photographer (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stas1995 (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Near identical version already featured. B.p. 22:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the info of this nomination--Citron (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Bp is right, both pictures are similar being this one the one with higher resolution. The other one should be then delisted Poco a poco (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Overwriting existing files says "Files that have been awarded a special status like Commons Featured Picture (or the equivalent on another Wikimedia project) should never be overwritten - the status applies to a particular file version, and even minor changes should be uploaded as a new file." The other one will be delisted after.--Citron (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then please start delisting procedure. B.p. 14:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joke ? Who told you that this nomination will lead ? --Citron (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No joke, without that procedure it will surely not lead. B.p. 16:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fatal error ? I take risk!--Citron (talk) 17:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. Overwritting a low resolution (featured) picture with one with higher resolution is just common sense. I cannot believe that anybody here could have a problem with that. Ignore the rules when they don't support the project.

And now to Commons:Overwriting existing files. First reason to accept overwritting says: "replacement with higher resolution versions of the same file". So, please, close this nomination and overwrite the current version Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Can we move on now? B.p. 21:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But...but...But it is not me who wants it! PLEASE CHECK HERE, HERE, HERE and put you agree ! I don't know what to do...I totally agree with you Poco a poco and Biopics !--Citron (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a complicated issue as some people involved and trying to fight for their stands. It is not advised to overwrite an EN:FP; but here the EN:FP version is already a separate file. As in case of COM:FP, I think the consensus here can be considered to overwrite the existing file. My only concern is about the uneven crop (as I expressed earlier). So Support to overwrite. J Kadavoor J e e 06:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — The restoration and cropping do improve on the original FP. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Crop is off-centre ~~and noise is terrible at full resolution~~.Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solar Police↑↑Speak 16:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support supperbe --Luc Viatour (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jml3 (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overwitten (File:Marrus orthocanna NOAA.jpg was moved to File:Marrus orthocanna.jpg; merging with already featured, exact duplicate)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals