Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mill Pond, Monroe County.jpg

File:Mill Pond, Monroe County.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2009 at 17:31:57

Info created by Nicholas_T - uploaded by User:Neurolysis - nominated by 86.96.229.85 17:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- 86.96.229.85 17:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Sorry, no anonymous votes allowed. Log in to vote, please --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Support Miusia (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated -- Pro2 (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated --staka.^talk 22:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support While it is true that this image is oversaturated we have to consider the viewer, not the average one of us who understands f-stops, ISO, color formats, images and photography. This image is interesting to the general public; it's far oversaturation is actually what makes it a good image. It offers an ethereal quality to the pond and brings the clouds into the image in an also ethereal manner. We have to ignore the technical qualities of this image and just simply look at it. In this regard it is outstanding. Who cares if it is artificial looking?! It is also wonderfully composed! I'd urge those above who oppose to reconsider it with the eyes of the viewer, not those of the photographer! It's the sort of image that would find a great home in the press, and in the photo-books! fr33kman -s- 23:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Whatever the other views, the picture is still oversaturated and thus doesn't deserves the FP status for me. →Diti the penguin — 23:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above - also, FP images need to have certain "technical qualities" that cant be ignored - besides, the content/composition not spectacular... so cant justify overlooking its flaws in any way. -- Dcubillas (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated —kallerna™ 16:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose great composition, bad execution. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated Hmm I like such fancy colors, why not. But this is definitely not a place where they should be --Aktron (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support that picture is THE exception where oversaturation is valuable. looks artistic here. --Jeses (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated --Doucus (talk) 08:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Dori - Talk 00:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]