Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morenas negras (Muraena augusti), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 52.jpg

File:Morenas negras (Muraena augusti), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 52.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2022 at 21:54:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Moray eels (Muraena augusti) and a cleaner shrimp (Lysmata grabhami), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain. It belongs to the family of moray eel and is endemic of the Canary Islands, Madeira and Azores. It is non-migratory, and dwells at a depth range of 0 to 250 metres (0 to 820 ft), most often at around 0 to 50 metres (0 to 164 ft). Muraena augusti is active during the night and hides in holes or crevices during the day. It can reach up to 100 centimetres (39 in) length and is a carnivore that feeds on small fishes, shrimps and crabs. Like all other moray eels their vision is poor but their sense of smell extraordinary. We have 2 FPs of this genus, this one of the same species and this one of another species but same genus. In both cases you can only see the head of one moray, here we can see more than that and as add-on there is a second one. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 06:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I put this great shot through Topaz Denoise AI and, to my eyes, the result was a huge improvement. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd like to see that version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, Charlesjsharp, and thank you for working on it! I'll also work on it on Saturday and may upload a new version --Poco a poco (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Charlesjsharp, I looked closer into it and applied similar changes (I found the denoising a tad to much, so not going that far) specially in terms of denoising and compensating the "critical areas" with some sharpening. I like indeed the result overall and I'm therefore happy that you uploaded that version. If somebody prefers your version, I would add it as an alternative to the original nom. Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I prefer his version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- IamMM (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The fish look very creepy though... --SHB2000 (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~-- Radomianin (talk) 06:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO this version looks much more “real”. --Aristeas (talk) 06:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, due to noise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. -- Ivar (talk) 06:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alt edit

Comment Here are additional version uploaded by Charlesjsharp using Topaz AI for denoising. Ikan Kekek should I ping everybody? Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Florstein, Schnobby, Urban Versis 32, IamMM, Famberhorst, SHB2000, Llez, Agnes Monkelbaan, and Daniel Case: Ok, pinging those who may have not seen the new version with more denoising Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support yes, all the voters should be pinged. -- Ivar (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the alternative version which is a real improvement. I have moved my support to this one. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I find the noise of the previous version acceptable anyway. -- Alex Florstein (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Denoising has improved the swinging areas of the fish's body, I prefer this one. -- IamMM (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I honestly like the other one better, it seems more natural. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support My favorite version.--Ermell (talk) 06:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)

The chosen alternative is: File:Morenas negras (Muraena augusti), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 52.jpg