Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:N.Odorata.jpg
File:N.Odorata.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2015 at 00:37:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created by SanctuaryX - uploaded by SanctuaryX - nominated by SanctuaryX -- SanctuaryX (talk) 00:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Well detailed image of the flower, making it easily identifiable, with good technical quality, and does not suffer from under or overexposure. It offers some scientific detail as well, with clear view to the reproductive organs, three of the four bracts, the top side and underside of the lily pads, developing lily pads, and venation on the underside of the lily pad is visible. A few stems of the lily pads are visible as well. SanctuaryX (talk) 00:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose too soft and unsharp. No details and halos around the petals visible. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- How are there "no details visible"? If you're being hyperbolic, I don't think a critique is an appropriate place for that. You can see venation clearly, the reproductive organs (as the flower is bisexual) and how they connect to the axis, and you can even see the circle in the axis where the stem attaches to the flower, the waxy leaf surface, and even wrinkles in the petals. Alchemist-hp -- SanctuaryX (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support Quite good. Yann (talk) 09:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Neutral The soft focus is acceptable for me, about halos per Alchemist-hp and the composition is a bit unbalanced to me. --Laitche (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alchemist.--Jebulon (talk) 09:29, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
