Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NSG Rotwildpark Stuttgart 2014 14 Bärenschlössle.jpg
File:NSG Rotwildpark Stuttgart 2014 14 Bärenschlössle.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 08:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural (not sure actually)
Info c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 08:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Support — Julian H.✈ 08:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Another panorama, but not very interesting and too much processed (see the leaves).... in short, no wow--Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Just as a note, I don't think this counts as a panorama. — Julian H.✈ 10:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Σπάρτακος: I did some editing now to improve the leave rendering, but I might just have made it worse because I'm not sure exactly what you dislike about them. Could you check and/or specifiy what you don't like? — Julian H.✈ 12:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support At first it didn't made me fell WOW because it seemed like a usual lake-side picture. Although, the reflection on the water is simply brilliant here. A few clouds in the sky might help, though. -- Pofka (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support per Pofka. --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Maybe QI,nothing more for me. --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 21:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Livio and Pofka. As some of you may have noticed, I've been doing a lot of reorganizing work on the "water reflections" categories in the last month or so, so I've looked at a lot of pictures like this. This one is very well-done, definitely a QI, but doesn't stand out enough for me to support it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. (Sorry for the workload, should have probably seen this myself) — Julian H.✈ 21:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
