Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NYC Panorama edit.jpg

File:NYC Panorama edit.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2009 at 06:53:13

Info created by Jnn13 - uploaded by Jnn13 - nominated by Jnn13 -- Jnn13 (talk) 06:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jnn13 (talk) 06:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Minimum size for panorama is 800px height --Muhammad 11:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ impressive. 800px height is in my opinion not necessary if width is > 9MP --norro 12:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently tilted. --norro 16:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't see anything excepted a skyline. Commons has a limit of 100MB for files. A good reason to upload a panorama with real-size photos. Panoramic images need to have a minimum height of 800px. →Diti the penguin — 12:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~, tilted. --Aqwis (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted. —kallerna™ 16:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don´t see the tilt. Can you point that out? --norro 21:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Using the straightedge tool in Photoshop on the Empire State Building, I can detect a 0.6 degree tilt. --Aqwis (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Diti -- Dcubillas (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Question There's what appears to be a stitching error in the far right of the picture, visible in the water. Is this a stitching error or something else? -- Peipei (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment Fair enough. I'm working on a larger panorama of the same, per comments above, and will address the issue. Jnn13 (talk) 14:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment I made a new panorama: File:NYC Panorama edit2.jpg with original (23,268 × 1,580 pixels) height. LiveChocolate (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 3 oppose => not featured. Pbroks13 (talk) 06:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NYC Panorama edit2.jpg, not featured edit

Support the new version. --Aqwis (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support →Diti the penguin — 01:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX^talk 07:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 13:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dcubillas (talk) 14:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- This version has more noticeable vignetting effects visible in the sky, the first version - although containing other errors - did not suffer from vignetting problems. -- Peipei (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Curvy horizon --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 15:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe it could look nice on the wall, but on computer screen is image with this dimensions ratio for nothing. --Karel (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Karelj: FP guidelines state: "Graphics located on Commons may be used in ways other than viewing on a conventional computer screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices may be used in the future, so it is important that nominated pictures have as high a resolution as possible."
Comment, this is an invalid oppose reason. --Aqwis (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support what do you expect from panorama, 4:3 ratio!? --LiveChocolate (talk) 09:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As much as I would like to support this picture, there are bands in the sky where colour changes are very apparent. --Muhammad 11:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Horizon is not straight and the banding in the sky is too visible. Lycaon (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please note, I finally uploaded an update to the original panorama. Jnn13 (talk) 03:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It would probably be a good idea to withdraw these FPCs and resubmit the update of the original. --Aqwis (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 4 oppose => not featured. Pbroks13 (talk) 06:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]