Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 foto2 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg

File:Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 foto2 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2017 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
Info In the foreground you see recently build extra protection in case of a river flood, the monumental bridge is just in the background.
Info created by Michielverbeek - uploaded by Michielverbeek - nominated by Michielverbeek --Michielverbeek (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PumpkinSky talk 17:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Curves and lines going everywhere; from the stairs down and curving to the left ... over the bridge, another bridge... Neat. :) --Peulle (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice light on the bridge but too much of the photo is unlit. And the couple in the centre of the photo catch they eye but are dark. -- Colin (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find the crop on the right too tight, and the stairs in the foreground too distracting --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- HalfGig talk 22:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground is too dark, lots of uninteresting sky at the top. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but I have to agree with the other opposers --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the foreground takes away too much from the bridges, which also suffer from this angle. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 16:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]