Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odles y Stevia da Secëda te Gherdëina.jpg

File:Odles y Stevia da Secëda te Gherdëina.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2019 at 17:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hefty resolution of course, great landscape, dramatic light. Well controlled detail in the highlights. One problem with this are the crushed shadows: all the buildings are very dark with not a lot of details visible. People, ski lifts and snow cannons are mostly just silouettes. Details on the mountains and distant trees are fine, however. ~~After Ikan’s observation I found a total of 10 dust spots all over the image (see notes).~~ – Lucas 18:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I do agree with Lucas about shadow clipping. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BoothSift 21:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 21:15, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unappealing composition. Charles (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I haven't decided on a vote, but there's one big dust spot at the top margin (partly bisected by it), not too far from the right, and another in the snow almost directly below that, a bit up from the bottom margin, between two strands of trees. Please look through the picture, as it's possible there might be more dust spots that weren't apparent to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ikan Kekek: , @Lucasbosch: Probably my monitor is set with contrast too low. Thanks for pointing out all the dustspots with great effort. I appreciate and apologize --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Charles. -- Karelj (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I love the idea behind this, but the clouds take away too much of what could work about it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]