Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg

File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2017 at 08:33:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info View of the chamber below the windcatcher of the Golestan Palace, used today as a photographic museum, Iran's capital city, Tehran. The UNESCO World Heritage Site belongs to a group of royal buildings that were once enclosed within the mud-thatched walls of Tehran's arg ("citadel") and is one of the oldest of the historic monuments in the city. All by me, Poc o² 08:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Another beautiful one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 11:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 12:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question The asymetri is because the picture was not taken from the center? (see note) --The Photographer 12:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, The Photographer, it looks like I was a few centimeters off to the left. I tried to apply some perspective correction but the result was no improvement Poc o² 16:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer because I had feeling that It was not a perpesctive problem, thanks for the clarification --The Photographer 23:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great Diego - how fitting for FPC that your first nomination this year is an image of a photography museum, a place to admire and assess pictures. Speaking of assessing images, maybe you'd like to become again more active in the admittedly tedious process of evaluating other nominations here? Your expertise and input would be much appreciated! Frohes Neues Jahr und Gut Licht! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Martin, I promise to be more active after one week at least until the next row :) Poc o² 16:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 13:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 17:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Iranian mullahs should get that fountain going again; otherwise people are going to think it's some sort of incongruous phallic monument. Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have something against linga stones? ;) --cart-Talk 23:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I don't. But the conservative Iranian government might. Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Composition. --Mile (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Picture. --Gnosis (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture