Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama de La Garde depuis la chapelle au matin.jpg

File:Panorama de La Garde depuis la chapelle au matin.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2011 at 22:42:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by esby - uploaded by esby - nominated by esby -- Esby (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info 197 megapixels image - Avoid loading the original image directly in your browser -- Esby (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info 90 images enfused into 30 ones which were exposure fused from stacks with hugin into a seamless panorama. -- Esby (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Esby (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Steven Walling 01:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For sure this is impressive work but this is mainly from size point of view, and not only that matters. There's way too much exposures blending artifacts going on and this looks unnatural. - Benh (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment I don't know if you agree in my comment on the image.. but if you can re-stitch this image and remove this error. I would like a little more sky at the top but this is minor problem because sky can easily cloned. Ggia (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  CommentI'll try that this evening,there is also some noises in the barrier. It's linked to what benh said actually. Not sure if this can be easily fixed. I am against adding more sky, because it would probably affect the panorama viewver. Esby (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment Don't add the sky to the panorama viewer.. add it afterwards, cloning the sky.. it is easy.. Ggia (talk) 09:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Some stitching errors, visible along the guardrail, and blending problems as pointed out above. Sting (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now as well as the composition imho, the remaining errors on the guardrail are almost invisible, but I noticed now that there are several ghosts in the area framed. Sting (talk) 23:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- Managed to fix the blending issue I could see. (I merged the two exposure stack of the bottom to get 20 images (10 top, 10 bottom) to blend in a panorama).Gonna upload a new version, I also changed the angle of cut, as it fits more logic to not cut the city in two part. Esby (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC) - Edit: new version is up; but the projection is wrong. Did not notice until I uploaded it to the new version. Should be cylindrical and not equirectangular... Esby (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unrealistic deformed picture.--Jebulon (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Do you mind sharing more your thought? do you plan to oppose all non-rectinear panorama that exists and are featured? Esby (talk) 12:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sting--shizhao (talk) 13:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Esby (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC) -- no time to work on this image for now, I'll check later. Esby (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]