Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris - IGNF PVA 1-0 1985-07-17 C2314-0022 1985 FR3736 0065.jpg

File:Paris - IGNF PVA 1-0 1985-07-17 C2314-0022 1985 FR3736 0065.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 00:33:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info created by Institut géographique national - uploaded by Pyb - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 00:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 00:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nino Verde (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why are you nominating an unprocessed image? Is the border etc. significant? Charles (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe I just don't understand -- is there some significance to this particular aerial shot? It's from 1985, but there's little other information here. Also wouldn't expect a FP to have archival notes in the margins. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:44, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent representation of the class of aerial imagery - and by that I mean that the border etc. are integral to why this should be an FP. Of course it can be cropped, but then it is no different to thousands of other aerial images. If someone wanted an FP to represent an aerial image the framing sets that scene and communicates that perfectly. The slightly washed out emulsion of the 80's film stock is also important - again, of course someone could take a shot with a cutting-edge HDR DSLR, but it wouldn't be this, and post-processing it to look like this is fake. This is a very nice image, and a great representation of what an FP should be - not beauty shots, but important representative shots. Very nice. SFC9394 (talk) 19:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 03:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]