Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pedo de lobo (Lycoperdon perlatum), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-11-14, DD 334-396 FS.jpg

File:Pedo de lobo (Lycoperdon perlatum), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-11-14, DD 334-396 FS.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2021 at 13:40:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Agaricales_(Gilled_Mushrooms)#Family_:_Agaricaceae
Info Young common puffball (Lycoperdon perlatum), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support cute! --Granada (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much of this subject is unsharp Seven Pandas (talk) 02:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good photo but none of it really looks 100% sharp to me, as if the frames of the focus stack are slightly misaligned. It's certainly better than anything I could do, but I'm not entirely convinced it's the best on Commons seeing how many good focus stacks we have seen lately. Cmao20 (talk) 03:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Seven Pandas and Cmao. --Ivar (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support IamMM (talk) 07:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why focus stacking when not all parts of the main subject are sharp? --Llez (talk) 11:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Unsharpness per others ... looks like there was some slight camera movement. Daniel Case (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]