Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 80.JPG
File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 80.JPG, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2016 at 21:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco (Diego Delso) - nominated by Lmbuga (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Info You can see here an exemplar of brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) in Punta Pitt, San Cristobal Island, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. Note: The alternative below had already been unsuccesfully nominated of a similar picture some months ago. Poco2 06:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Wav! Very good picture, nice light, perfect background. Cute. -- Lmbuga (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose in favor of the other version, if it's legitimately an "alt" version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is overpowering to me. INeverCry 06:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alt version
- Info I preffer this version, for example, compares the eyes --The Photographer (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support--Lmbuga (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support As always. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Is this legitimately an alt version? It is better, though, and I support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Thank you Miguel for this nom. I always was fond of this subject and still cannot understand the outcome of the first attempt. Poco2 06:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I see I changed my mind. What did it is that I thought about how detailed the picture of the pelican is, and the background looks OK at full-page size, though it still looks strange to me at full size. Best for me not to think about that part too much... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Question What do you mean ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Previously, when this photo, now presented as an alternate, was nominated, I opposed featuring it on the basis that I couldn't get past the background on the right side being so blurred at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Question What do you mean ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I see I changed my mind. What did it is that I thought about how detailed the picture of the pelican is, and the background looks OK at full-page size, though it still looks strange to me at full size. Best for me not to think about that part too much... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --w.carter-Talk 07:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'm confused. This image is already shown in the gallery as FP. Charles (talk) 08:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Same as Charlesjsharp... Strange.--Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Jebulon, Charles: if it would be a Commons FP you'd see the FP star in the top right. As you can see in the FP template it is considered FP in the Spanish WP, but not in Commons. Poco2 15:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Mmmmh, yes of course, I've noticed this, but anyway, this picture is now listed as Commons FP--Jebulon (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I dont't get you Jebulon, Poco2 17:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Please have a look to the current categorization of this file...--Jebulon (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Are those cats for exclusive use of Commons FPs? That would be knew to me. I have though no problem with removing any categories containing "Featured" and not in "xxx Wikipedia" if there is consensus about that, but it isn't the place to discuss that, I guess. Poco2 17:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- The trees of Category:Featured pictures by country and similar, are only for Commons FP, because "FP's" on many wikipedia languages are not necessarily what we consider as the finest of Commons, making these categories rather trivial when sorted into. Thanks --A.Savin 18:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- It should be on category page, anyway, now diliff will win the first place --The Photographer (talk) 02:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- A.Savin: no problem, will remove the images that are FP somwhere but not on Commons (I just checked they are 20) from Category:Featured pictures by country and from Category:Featured pictures of landscapes (or whatever subject).
- The Photographer: is there something to win? what do you mean? Poco2 06:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I have the idea that in some point WMF will support the photographers with more FP. Maybe I'm wrong, however, could be nice see WMF supporting us with a camera or a lens, for example. --The Photographer (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is overpowering to me. INeverCry 06:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Pine✉ 04:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes