Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe.jpg

File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2014 at 10:01:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Isn't it underexposed a little ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done Fixed the slight underexposure, thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sky noise, miss some colors-contrast. --Mile (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Info If you mean color saturation it's enough imo. Btw it is a postprocessing procedure anyone can do like sharpening, downsampling etc. therefore I don't see any reason to do it myself. Thanks for the review anyhow --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose weak Very nice motive, but the composition is not convincing for me (also the contrast could be improved). The structures of the mountains in the background imho imply to place the top of the church between the lowest parts of the mountains (further to the left). The crop at the left is too tight for my personal taste. As it is on the photo, church and background do not interplay very well. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Question should I nominate this version --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Oh yes, do that! (I've added a note to suggest a crop) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I think Martin's suggestion is good and would be supported by me. --DXR (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Info I have tried the crop but it puts too much enphasis on the buildings on the right which I find rather disturbing --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I would leave original crop, its much more picturesque, just add some contrast and colors (vibrance). --Mile (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 16:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Halavar (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The bell tower is leaning a bit to the right, and the crop is very tight. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like it overall, lighting is ok, sharpness is ok and composition works for me. It is actually leaning in cw direction and the left crop is indeed to tight Poco² 09:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thanks for the support. I have worked a lot on the perspective and I don't think I can do better. Can you please show me where it is leaning but please allow for the fact that it is an old building --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Note added Poc o² 20:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1 -- Colin (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Info The bell tower is not leaning, please give it a closer look --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - The verticals have now been corrected. But the crop is still rather tight. -- Colin (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Unterillertaler (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The crop is very tight. Lotje (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral tending to oppose per the opposers. But opposing now should be unfair IMO...--Jebulon (talk) 09:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /J e e 14:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings