Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plaza Mayor de Santa Ana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, May 2018.jpg
File:Plaza Mayor de Santa Ana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, May 2018.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2018 at 16:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
- Info Plaza Mayor de Santa Ana and City Hall, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, as seen atop the Cathedral of Santa Ana. When heading towards the city I kept hoping for the clouds to miraculously disappear - only to realize that this dramatic pre-rain blanket of clouds helps create a special mood that is rather picturesque in its own way. All by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Weather, composition ...--The Photographer 16:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment the weather is a matter of taste, but please do elaborate on your issues with the composition, The Photographer. Thanks --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- IMHO composition is centered, not remarcable main subject, btw, tilt --The Photographer 18:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the composition is fine, but the light is a bit flat, a bit dull. Not very exciting. --Peulle (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Perhaps even threatening clouds thicken slightly.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support The hills with all the houses, looking very much like some crazy piles of LEGO, make the picture. :) Different, fresh. --Cart (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose dull light. Charles (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support I like. Not sure it would have been better with sunny weather (sun = shadows). --A.Savin 21:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Alex. The sky looks very much like ours in this Monsoon season! :) Jee 03:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Very drab, doesn't excite me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice view and good quality, but I agree with Ikan. In the picture there is some dynamic thank to the perspective but I'd tried to emphasize that with a wider angle view in order to have the feeling that I'm surrounded by those 2 rows of houses. Poco2 08:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Info Addressing the issues mentioned above, I've tried to increase clarity and brightness of the image's lower half (the city). The lighting should be less drab now. As far as a wider angle is concerned, well, I'd have preferred a bit more space on both sides as well, but some protruding elements of the church's facade (i.e. ugly stones) prevented me from getting any - pinging: The Photographer, Peulle, Famberhorst, Cart, Charles, A.Savin, Michielverbeek, Jee, Johann Jaritz, Ikan Kekek, Poco2 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Still not for me. Charles (talk) 20:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- The main issue to me is the perspective, I would have enjoyed it from a lower point of view, not sure whether just pitching down the camera would have made it. Poco2 16:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. The weather is not a problem (clouds are nice), but I think we have too much sky and not enough plaza (Composition issue). Not a bad picture, but not FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Alex. Empty bue sky could also be dull. --Milseburg (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Peulle. --Karelj (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I would prefer lower camera angle to get more of the plaza. Lighting is flat. Nothing particularly special to merit FP status. —Eve Teschlemacher (talk) 06:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)