Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pope Francis Korea Haemi Castle 19.jpg

File:Pope Francis Korea Haemi Castle 19.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2014 at 09:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jeon Han - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment User:Jkadavoor mentioned on IRC this might need a rotation, if so could others help out with it. I feel it might be fine as is. russavia (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know whether the pole need to be straight. Good work probably in a condition where flash is not allowed. J e e 09:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The green tint, also compared with the watermarked version, should be fixed I think. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Julian H, could you fix them? Jee 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I can try later. Or is it possible to fix the tint without re-compressing the image? Probably not, but that would be ideal. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done: New version uploaded. I had to remove the html link from the EXIF because commons won't let me upload a file with html syntax in the EXIF. Why that worked the first time, I don't know. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks Julian. We've a discussion about the html tags in EXIF, and our understanding is only html tags like <a> are prohibited; plain URL has no issue. J e e 02:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the left "border" is not totally vertical. See note. It's fixable? ArionEstar (talk) 00:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We can't consider that pole which is part of popemobile. J e e 02:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support now. Habemus Papam! ;-)

ArionEstar (talk) 19:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Kbh3rd (talk) 03:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 00:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just an old man with severe delusions. DoF is quite shallow (hand is blurred). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hand is cut and blurred --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice shot, but low wow and blurred hand makes is less eligible for FP. Left edge of the image is confusing. Pugilist (talk) 07:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop too tight (by both camera and popemobile), unfortunate background (what’s that thing just behind his head?), and I don’t like the central composition and straight-into-the-lens look either. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the upper background makes the picture unattractive to me. --Cayambe (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above Jiel (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Revi_complaint? 13:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gra phi um 14:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have now thought about it for some time and the background is still bugging me. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 11:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]