Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG

File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2014 at 11:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Comprehensive view of the waterfalls over the Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, Huasca de Ocampo, State of Hidalgo, Mexico. All by me, Poc o² 11:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 11:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice place, high geological interest and value ! But you were not lucky with the weather, and the long exposure has consequences: a disturbing ghost crossing the bridge...--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ghost removed. Poc o² 19:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Have you tried a crop out of the sky, and an increasing of the vibrance ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have tried it and created the alternative below with the result. The "bad weather issue" is gone but the result is pretty different to the former one. Poc o² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks again for your efforts... I don't know what to think now...--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I played with boosting the saturation in a local copy of this image, and I think it helped, but I would exclude that bright patch of grass behind the trees in the upper right from the process. I also think a shift of the view slightly to the left could help -- remove that fragment of a road from the right side and move the left end of the footbridge a little farther from the left edge of the image, though I cannot say what that would then bring into the picture. I don't know whether these changes would make it FP, though. --Kbh3^rd talk 17:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done I increased saturation, chose a warmer WB and cropped the road on the right. Poc o² 19:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good and well composed (centered), it's a pity for the weather. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 22:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico talk 19:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow for me. Another giant's causeway! --Kadellar (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great catch in every way. --Lauro Sirgado^contribs 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info Alternative with a different top crop and higher vibrance setting Poc o² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I believe the sky weigh a little (bit) unfavorable, but without it the image (in the first contact) is devoid of depth IMO. --Lauro Sirgado^contribs 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /J e e 16:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG