Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Protest of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in Times Square (62507).jpg
File:Protest of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in Times Square (62507).jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2022 at 13:11:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
- Info A father and son at a rally in support of Ukraine in Times Square, NYC. Yes, the background is busy and the light is a bit harsh, but I keep coming back to this shot. Demonstrations like this are typically full of anger and desperation, and I was struck by the tone of pride and hopefulness here, which I think is well summarized in this guy's expression. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I really like this image, but I have a serious personality rights concern, even more with a child being in the picture. Did the father consent to this image going public under a free licence? --Kritzolina (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- In the US, when people are in public there's not a requirement to ask for permission to photograph or publish photographs. At a demonstration like this, it's generally expected that people want to be visible/photographed/documented. That said, I do make it a habit to ask (and always when children are involved), and did ask permission in this case. I don't make it a habit of chatting with people about what licensing the photos will have, though (??). — Rhododendrites talk | 15:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- SupportThank you for that answer, that is good enough for me to support this. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have added a {{Consent}} tag to the image page to address this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- In the US, when people are in public there's not a requirement to ask for permission to photograph or publish photographs. At a demonstration like this, it's generally expected that people want to be visible/photographed/documented. That said, I do make it a habit to ask (and always when children are involved), and did ask permission in this case. I don't make it a habit of chatting with people about what licensing the photos will have, though (??). — Rhododendrites talk | 15:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support This picture really resonated within me. — Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 16:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral I like it, original and the picture talks to me but the ligthing is really difficult for a kind of portrait Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose In a mass of pictures this one wouldn't really stick out to me as exceptional with the lighting and background. Maybe if it was just the kid in the center --Lupe (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- As it happens, we have a mass of pictures. :) I hope you/others will nominate the ones which do stand out. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support FP means stand out. As Rhododendrites has appropriately stated, the man's expression stands out extraordinarily. His poignant face outweighs the unfavorable lighting conditions. I also think I see tears in the son's eyes. Maybe I can't be completely impartial with an Ukrainian family member, but the picture touches me deeply! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco for the light. Some obvious blown out chunks, and the one on the forehead breaks the deal, as does the fact that the kid and the
presumedfather don't look in the same direction. - Benh (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC) - Oppose per Benh.--Ermell (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Cut feet of the child. Also the hair is distracting at the right. Agree with Benh's review too -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This is a nice, moodful, emotional shot of the protest. It would suit every article on this event very good. Taken out of context, it will lose quite a lot of that. Viewing it just as a picture, there’s all the circumstances you can hardly avoid in a demonstration like this: cut-off neighbouring persons, cluttered and busy background, harsh light. The missing feet don’t bother me that much here, since nearly the father’s entire body has been cut off as well :) you have to pick a crop of course, and it’s not bad, that’s not the problem here. The picture, as it is, is just too arbitrary, too common in such a gathering in my eyes to get a feature for being outstanding. If only the background were a bit more blurred :) --Kreuzschnabel 09:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support the lighting doesn't really bother me much. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral Sorry, but the image does not stand out to me. That said, it doesn't 'not stand out' enough for me to oppose either. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional. --Tagooty (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, there are blown or near-blown highlights. Yes, the background is a little cluttered. Yes, there's an awkward crop at lower right. But nonetheless I think the pose is great and has huge symbolic value ... the boy, dressed in Ukraine's colors and holding a Ukrainian flag, is literally being supported by his father (also in Ukrainian colors). So in supporting his son he is also supporting Ukraine. Daniel Case (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)