Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente Internacional de Tuy.jpg

File:Puente Internacional de Tuy.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2017 at 11:52:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created by Harpagornis - uploaded by Harpagornis - nominated by Harpagornis -- Harpagornis (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harpagornis (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think that photographically, it would have been better to focus on the metal structure for an abstract (as you did in this photo), which could be done by taking a square crop out of this one. The rectangular sunlit patches are a bit disappointing given that other photos show a nice diagonal pattern that matches the sides. The quality lacks sharpness, contrast and there's colour noise throughout that is visible to me even at screen resolution. Unlike luminance noise, colour noise doesn't really disappear with downsampling, but is usually quite easy to reduce in software. It sort of looks like you turned off colour noise reduction, or under-exposed and had to raise the exposure a lot in post. Do you have the raw file to process it better? ISO 500 wasn't really necessary here as your shutter speed is two stops higher than required for a hand-held shot. -- Colin (talk) 12:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Harpagornis, why did you place the vanishing point (/"center") of the view slightly off-center? I'm curious for your reason(s). I would have placed the camera perfectly in the center and make a perfectly symmetrical shot of the scene, why did you not? – Lucas ^T 17:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I can see why you didn't just crop into the center like the other photo—to keep the lit spots—but there's too much of the stone walls to not offset the metallic part. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin & Daniel. lNeverCry 04:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]