Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg
File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 14:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info c/u Baresi franco n Arctic Kangaroo -- (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Excellent --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support as usual, I'm tempted to say ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Bgag (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the nomination and comments. It took all day to get a couple of decent shots of this lovely finch, but I think it was worth it. Hopefully I'll get the male in a similar pose next time. --Baresi F (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Really very nice, well done. I remember being camouflaged for hours at the mercy of bloodsucking mosquitoes in the jungle of Margarita Island for a poor decision. Sometimes it is simply a matter of luck --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Wilfredo. It would be worth putting up with a lot to get a lucky shot like that :) --Baresi F (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- In certain circumstances, it is about making a burst of 100 pictures, and then do the big task of evaluating each photograph. Nice Shoot, you are welcome --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Really very nice, well done. I remember being camouflaged for hours at the mercy of bloodsucking mosquitoes in the jungle of Margarita Island for a poor decision. Sometimes it is simply a matter of luck --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --ArildV (talk) 11:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose We have so many birds, that the bar is very high... I can only oppose when it has chromatic noise on the "shoulders" (see note)--Jebulon (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out Jebulon, as I'd definitely missed it. I've uploaded a new version with the chroma noise reduced - is it any better? comment of Baresi franco who forget sign
- Yes, it is better, and I'm proud if my comment made the picture better, but I still see something... Anyway, I'm not a good judge anymore. I've seen a flaw once, and now I only see this part of your picture, sorry...--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Human nature. :) We may not see the flaws initially, but when we eventually spot it, we keep focusing on that. I've had this experience many time before. ;) --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it is better, and I'm proud if my comment made the picture better, but I still see something... Anyway, I'm not a good judge anymore. I've seen a flaw once, and now I only see this part of your picture, sorry...--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out Jebulon, as I'd definitely missed it. I've uploaded a new version with the chroma noise reduced - is it any better? comment of Baresi franco who forget sign
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Gidip (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 22:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds