Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg

File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 05:22:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All (c/u/n) by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--ArildV (talk) 06:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood and perspective but chromatic aberration in the reflections of boats and distortions. --Laitche (talk) 08:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The distortion is because of wild angle 14mm and I don't see any CA, can you add note please -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I added image notes of CA. --Laitche (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't see any CAs there. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Well then what is that pink, yellow and green color? A rainbow? --Laitche (talk) 13:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Looks like color banding to me. CAs can not be more than a few pixels wide, and are necessarily always the same width across a whole part of the photo. It's not possible to have CAs in a small isolated spot, at least not if the lenses aren't horrible messed up. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 14:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        As you are saying those are not CAs maybe. It's maybe a flaw by sensor or low pass filter, in any case a flaw is a flaw. --Laitche (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Quality is excellent, I'm slightly torn with my vote because the scene could probably have been captured in a similar way from 1-2 meters further away with slightly less distortion and a little more space around the boat on the right. ~~Also, the dark areas have been brightened quite heavily, I don't think brightening was necessary to that extent.~~ It's definitely a beautiful image though. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done (in part) I have see what you mean Laitche and Julian_Herzog is right, this is because of too much brightened, I've tried to correct it. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support Then, thanks. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 17:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay I withdraw opposing vote. --Laitche (talk) 18:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and quality are really good. I do not agree with Julian: IMHO the extreme wide-angle view makes the photo somehow special. A photo from 1-2 meters back had not been that good. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the color balance is incorrect. The picture is too dark and the color of the sky is unnatural. Is seems for me like the first version was better. --sfu (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
no response. Oppose --sfu (talk) 13:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes you're right, for me too the first is better, but I will no change another, read the others comment, thanks anyway --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - And a lot of users have voted for the current version, what do you want? I can't change this version, they have voted for --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I red comments before voting. Actually you have already done what you are talking about. Four people have voted before the change. You don't know weather they were following the discussion. Counting the votes it's better to keep the current version. Anyway I think the color flaw is more important than some details one, because not really too many people are going to watch this beautiful picture in full resolution, but everbody's going to watch is small version. And anyway the picture is going to be FP, I just want to express my oppose for promoting incorrectly color balanced images. Otherwise it's FP for me --sfu (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I will reworked it, and maybe I will renominate it, but now I revert on the first version --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]