Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SBB RBDe 560 Train des Vignes.jpg

File:SBB RBDe 560 Train des Vignes.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2010 at 20:37:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info SBB "NPZ" trainset with unique "Train des Vignes" livery on the very scenic line from Vevey to Puidoux-Chexbres, high above lake Geneva.
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, great composition as always! --Aqwis (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't feel confident of the quality. And the subject is a bit small. But the composition is too good to oppose here. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question What is it that you don't like about the quality? I know the sharpness isn't perfect, but I didn't want to downscale the picture just to make it look sharper. --Kabelleger (talk) 15:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - yeah, the sharpness could be better. And downscaling isn't good because the train would be smaller. So, sorry, I can't give more than a neutral. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support The train is rather small indeed, but the scenic landscape is an essential part of the picture. Very nice composition! -- MJJR (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background unsharp and too foggy. --Karel (talk) 16:30, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've tweaked the light levels slightly in the hope that will address the 'foggy' quality; undo if not liked - MPF (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Really nothing special. --Llorenzi (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ghabara (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Kind of busy composition, might've been better if taken around twilight. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]