Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sakurajima at Sunset.jpg

File:Sakurajima at Sunset.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 04:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gribeco - uploaded by Gribeco - nominated by Gribeco -- Gribeco (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gribeco (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superbe ! --Wikinade (talk) 05:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 08:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 11:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The image appears very noisy (all throughout color noise) when viewed at 100%. I don't understand the rational of using ISO 1600 when you had the luxury of 1/800 second? At 40mm length, you could have easily taken the photograph hand-held at 1/200 second and thereby using ISO 400. That could have given you the same level of sharpness and much less/well-controlled noise level. Also, at ISO 1600 if you notice, there are color shifts happening --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Kadellar (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]