Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 04-07 PAN.JPG

File:Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 04-07 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2021 at 22:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile#Antofagasta_Region
Info Salar de Pujsa, Antofagasta Region with some of the volcans in the area in the background, specially Cerro Pili (6,046 metres (19,836 ft)) on the left and Cerro Colachi (5,631 metres (18,474 ft)) to the right (see image notes), north of Chile. The salt pan is located 4,500 metres (14,800 ft) over the sea level and has a surface of 14 square kilometres (5.4 sq mi). c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Panorama. --Gnosis (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and it's nice to see another one of your Chilean salt pan photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 09:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp and very beautiful panorama without any obvious stitching errors. Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 18:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry. First it's not really an impressive compo. I mean, it didn't have to be this wide a FOV to show mostly the same thing across the horizontal scope of the frame. Second, it is (another) of your panorama with a very obvious broken horizon (it "falls of" on the right side). And third... the light, flat and harsh. - Benh (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's always a mistery to me why some veteran and demanding reviewers that show up from time to time mainly get attracted by my noms. If you don't like it, fine, there is not much I can do about it. Regarding the horizon on the right, I agree, there is some room for improvement, will upload an update later. Poco a poco (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no need to look too much into it. I just happen to like panorama, so I will spot these things quickly and since it's a recurrent thing, I thought I'd just drop a word. If I really voted, u'd certainly be less happy ;) - Benh (talk) 12:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  
  A bigger mystery is how come despite being told countless times that your horizons are broken, you still submit these to FPC. It's not even subtle and someone as veteran as you should begin to spot these issues. - Benh (talk) 12:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benh I've uploaded a version with a correction of the horizon in the far right. From that to "broken" there is a long distance, but who cares, I do not. --Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: It's now noticeably leaning to the left. And try not to minimize critics (I don't think I'm biased). That's how you improve on things. I consider something broken when It can be spotted just by scrolling over it. - Benh (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- - Poco, please stop making personal attacks about the reviewers. If you disagree with the review, disagree with the review, not with the few people who still dare to oppose some of your nominations. -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment imho the sky looks oversaturated (or excessively polarized?). Even white clouds are turning blue on the edges. --Ivar (talk) 09:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't polarized the sky or apply any special settings, do we need to start this discussion over? we have discussed it several times Poco a poco (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there was no need to lash out. One link to the discussion would have been more appropriate. --Ivar (talk) 11:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar you can have a look here or here (it is though funny that there was not discussion here, here, here or here) but as I'll not be able to make any further changes in the file I reduce the saturation to skip possible repetitive discussions here --Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Benh. Composition is arbitrary, with left side particularly oddly cropped, right side looks wonky and lower contrast vs right. Sky is posterised. -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These are the votes you must really enjoy. I'm sorry, Colin, you'll have to look for another victim to whom you can dump your frustration or whatever. I'm gone.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs) 21:45, 4 February 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question I do like this a lot, but see my note about the rocks in that area of the foreground. Is there some organic explanation for this? Or if not, is it correctable? Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Chile#Antofagasta_Region