Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Bernardo alle Terme - ceiling.jpg

File:San Bernardo alle Terme - ceiling.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2015 at 09:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 09:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico talk 09:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor sharpness, CA everywhere, clipped white,... --A.Savin 10:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. Interesting idea but poorly performed. ISO 400 seems to be too much for this camera, theres NR smudge visible everywhere. --Kreuz schnabel 12:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately I had to use ISO 400 because Security stopped me immediately with tripod --LivioAndronico talk 13:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the camera (see [1]). I hope that in 201X no DSLR performs this poorly at ISO 400. - Benh (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want i can send you the raw --LivioAndronico talk 15:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it's fine with you I can try to have a look. - Benh (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done New version --LivioAndronico talk 16:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Friends will be friends - right till the end! --A.Savin 16:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Even the enemies Savin

--LivioAndronico talk 16:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing sharp, too soft, some CA. No enemies here for me, just my opinion about a photograph. Not the best of "Commons", far from FP standards IMO, quality wise. Excellent point of view and nice symmetry though. Good idea, not good enough achievement.--Jebulon (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But infact Jebulon, you are objective and your opinion, as you know, is always well accepted. Anyway Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 17:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Jebulon. Well below FP technical quality standards. -- Colin (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good composition but not the quality --Σπάρτακος (talk)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]