Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Cesareo de Appia (Rome) ,interior.jpg

File:San Cesareo de Appia (Rome) ,interior.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2015 at 15:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info San Cesareo in Palatio or San Caesareo de Appia is a titular church in Rome, near the beginning of the Appian Way. It is dedicated to Saint Caesarius of Africa, a 2nd-century deacon and martyr.In the 4th century, Emperor Valentinian was cured at the shrine of Caesarius at Terracina, the site of his martyrdom. The emperor then decided to move his relics to Rome. They were taken to a church on the Palatine Hill, and when they were later moved to a new church, that church got the name "in Palatio", "at the Palace". It is also known as San Cesareo de Appia.Excavations have revealed a Roman bath on the site from the 2nd or 3rd century, with a huge black and white mosaic depicting Neptune and marine creatures, along with foundations of what is thought to be the first church here, built in the 8th century.All by -- LivioAndronico talk 15:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico talk 15:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ OK, but I miss the chair legs. -- ^talk 19:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The legs are there XRay...not all. I have a 18 mm and I can't take the roof and all the chair legs. Also because the church is short and after me there was the door. Anyway thanks for your time.--LivioAndronico talk 19:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support I don't know why the EXIF shows 24 mm. You're right, this kind of picture is not easy to take. And most of the image is very well done. So a "pro" is good. --XRay ^talk 04:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not have the passion of XRay for chairs but for me it is very good --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support What's all that stuff on the floor near the altar? Was this just after a wedding or something? Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Daniel,this church is famous in Rome for the weddings,thanx.--LivioAndronico talk 08:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done Diliff --The Photographer (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Photographer for support but don't think that David should be happy of the paragone --LivioAndronico talk 16:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought you were Diliff, I did not open the image, even to review it. Maybe I need change my vote --wait-- No, your image is ok, its not Diliff level, however, its good --The Photographer (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Code (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 09:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose sorry but not one of our best church interior images imo. Lower right part are not very sharp, the overexposed white chair seats are disturbing. Not a bad photo, but not one of our best imo.--ArildV (talk) 15:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"not one of our best" in comparison with what? --The Photographer (talk) 15:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the first sentence.--ArildV (talk) 16:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support mainly due to the lack of sharpness on the right as ArildV mentioned Poc o² 18:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]