Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sand sculpture - Puerto de Mogan.jpg

File:Sand sculpture - Puerto de Mogan.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2017 at 09:49:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support refreshingly different --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, something new here. Maybe a low level view could be more interesting with the sky on top --The Photographer 12:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Info It was at a popular beach. In the background there was no sky, but hundreds of bathing people. --Llez (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You might try diorama here. --Mile (talk) 13:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice image. But IMO it is a non permanent art work and this is not FoP in Spain. --XRay ^talk 19:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support because it's very nice. --XRay ^talk 07:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support @XRay: In general, works that are designed to be naturally destroyed by the elements are considered permanent. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But what if that guy from the Charles Atlas ads comes across it on the beach and kicks it into dust? Would that make it temporary?

Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I do not fancy the angle too much, but won't oppose either as it is refreshing. As The Photographer suggest a photo taken from a lower level would have been more interesting. I realize it was a busy beach, but I think an interesting position would have been to get the camera to the ground level, put on a zoom or a macro lens and make a detail shot of some of the sand houses showing just the sand castle elements with no traces of the normal beach and background. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Composition is pretty good in my opinion, but I'm supporting this mainly for uniqueness, though of course the picture quality is high, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 21:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear depiction of a very interesting subject -- Thennicke (talk) 02:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this AOV here as it cover a lot of details which we will miss in a lower position of the camera. This looks like an areal view of a castle. The light is harsh; but I can understand as it is from a beach. J e e 04:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 13:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 19:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Reguyla (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects