Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Sankt Sebastian Pfarrkirche hl Sebastian 02122015 9333.jpg

File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Sankt Sebastian Pfarrkirche hl Sebastian 02122015 9333.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 03:54:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful lighting and sky --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and lighting. Charles (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 18:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Serene HalfGig talk 23:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry --[reply]
Mild Oppose. I'm going to give you what I hope comes across as a high-level criticism, because the thing is, as others have said, this is indeed a beautiful picture, and the light is beautiful. However, the fields and sky are pretty inert (sure, the sky gradually gets darker going up, but that's not enough for a great composition in this case, in my opinion), so I think this photo lacks something that could make it better than merely quite good, but truly outstanding. It looks like I'm far outnumbered on this, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Your helpful in-depth reviews are highly appreciated as usual, even if they end up in a mild oppose like in this case. I will think about all items you wrote at the next opportunity when I will be out there taking open-air photos. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Same feeling as Ikan Kekek. Furthermore I find the light a bit harsh. All is nice, good, clear, very well composed, but I miss "something". Empty sky ? Enpty grass ? I don't know, this is just subjective and I'm sorry for that. And I've found one dust spot (at least), please see annotation. --Jebulon (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*

Comment De gustibus non disputandum. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dustspot was removed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support But tight blue sky is a little bit for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you, Agnes. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support A truly timeless building . Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support PumpkinSky talk 01:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings