Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwetzingen BW 2014-07-22 17-04-02.jpg

File:Schwetzingen BW 2014-07-22 17-04-02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2014 at 10:46:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support The image lacks detail but this is compensated by the great composition and colors, good job! Poc o² 11:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Guter Blick für eine ganz besondere Perspektive. Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu diesem gelungenen Foto! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bottom part is very unsharp, cobblesones look washed. --Mile (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tolle Komposition mit guter Nutzung wiederholter Elemente. Level of detail and sharpness is not very good, but with Poco. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image lacks detail and this is not compensated by the great composition and colors. Tourists are disturbing. And per Mile. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacking quality/sharpness is not acceptable for a FP, particularly for such more or less easy objects --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 11:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Arcalino (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe focus should have been on the first arch to avoid the unfocused cobblestones on the foreground, but I think it is good enough as it is. --Kadellar (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above -- Jiel (talk</99span>) 21:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, it lacks clarity and sharpness imo, and I don't find the subject to be too striking. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Soft, but I like it a lot --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico talk 08:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose die Bildqualität ist nicht OK, leider zu unscharf. Ansonsten ein tolles Bild! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Huge wow and great composition. Unfortunately, it cannot quite mitigate for the rather poor image quality in my opinion. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support - soft, but great composition --Pudelek (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Beautiful though a bit soft. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /J e e 14:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]