Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speyerbachbrücke IMG 4298.jpg

File:Speyerbachbrücke IMG 4298.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2022 at 16:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much elements distracting the main composition, hole foreground --Wilfredor (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Wilfredor, but I still like the scene. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 19:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good composition to me, though the picture isn't huge. Is there some purple CA on the branches on the upper right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly a nice scene, no doubt, and good light, but unfortunate composition IMHO. Assuming (from the title) the bridge to be the main subject, why is it squeezed into the left half of the frame and even cut off? Shouldn’t the main subject be entirely visible at least? The numerous foreground twigs are disturbing. Maybe a viewpoint at the rightmost pillar on the other side of the stream would have given a better composition. This is too unclear for me, I just don’t get the message what the author is trying to draw my attention to. Then, its soft. Very soft. In 2022, I’d expect an image of just 12 megapixels of a still object in good lighting to be crisp sharp and top detailed, and honestly, the 5D Mark II should be capable of that. --Kreuz schnabel 07:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. --Fischer.H (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]