Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sphaerophoria scripta .jpg

File:Sphaerophoria scripta .jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 8 May 2009 at 20:23:45

•  Info Sphaerophoria scripta. Everything by Lycaon (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lycaon (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
• --Richard Bartz was here (talk) 20:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I noticed ;-). Lycaon (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Linnaeus must be very touched when he 1758 discovered these cute fellows. I like the tender lighting very much. It's gone throught the hell of Vi, QI so FP should not be missed because of it's beauty.--Richard Bartz (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support despite the low DOF it is a great shot! --AngMoKio (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose Very good lighting but DOF too shallow for me. --Muhammad (talk) 21:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment no exif info --ianaré (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Indeed! I'll add tomorrow.Lycaon (talk) 23:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
    •  Done. Lycaon (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, one of the best insect shots in a good while. --Aqwis (talk) 22:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
• The framing is not the best and DOF is shallow, but I love the lighting and details on the head of this male. Thus  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 08:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• Weak  Support good lighting and details, though DOF could be better --ianaré (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose I would rather see the whole insect in focus. Unfortunately, only its head is. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Chrumps (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tiago Fioreze.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pro2 (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose If all of the head were in focus, I would probably support, but it isn't. But I still must say that I love the lighting and the velvety look of those eyes. The first time, I think, I've ever found something to like about a bug! Maedin\^talk 21:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too shallow DOF. Sorry. —kallerna™ 17:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Estrilda (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF. --Karel (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Sorry, too late. Lycaon (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 10:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)