Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St.-Josefs-Kirche, Frankfurt-Höchst, Nave view 20190921 1.jpg

File:St.-Josefs-Kirche, Frankfurt-Höchst, Nave view 20190921 1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 09:56:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info c/u/n DXR -- DXR (talk) 09:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DXR (talk) 09:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail. It is a bit grey, but I guess that's the building. -- Colin (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, I love your church interiors. And, per Colin's point, the majority of German Lutheran churches tend to be a little more grey and unadorned (although the ceiling here is quite lovely). It's nice to see a less extravagantly decorated church given a strong FP treatment. Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dark. Depressing in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what to make of this comment. It isn't a very bright place. Of course, it is possible to make it all bright and shiny, but imho, this would be a less faithful representation of reality. Against the white background, it look darkish, but in full screen, the lighting is appropriate. --DXR (talk) 06:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Austere interior. Real light is missing. It lacks wow for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent but slightly too dark IMO. Why is the metadata incomplete? ~~It would also be interesting to know how the contrast range was handled. This is only possible with HDR technology.~~ Found the description.--Ermell (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, PTGui kills most metadata, shot with D850 and Sigma 50mm 1.4. --DXR (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a trick for when the program 'blanks' metadata. You take the finished photo and put it as a layer on one of the original photos, merge into one layer, and hey presto you have all the metadata from the one photo on your HDR. I do this when I make panoramas and Photoshop deletes my info. Of course, it's not perfect, but metadata from one of the photos included in the HDR or pano, is better than none at all. --Cart (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support but should be a bit brighter --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given the fairly clear feedback, I have decided to slightly brighten and rework the tonemapping a bit. I hope this does not change any opinions too much, but am pinging the users who have already voted. Martin Falbisoner, Colin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, Basile Morin, Ermell, Uoaei1,Cart --DXR (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany