Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinen-Hofen - Evangelische Kirche(2015)5.jpg

File:Steinen-Hofen - Evangelische Kirche(2015)5.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2015 at 04:31:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. But I would like the church a bit more right. Otherwise than we would lose the trees at the right. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice landscape, but unfavorable composition - empty space in the middle, too tight crop ... --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer 16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It seems a bit oversaturated to me. --Laitche (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The proportions of the church spire does not look right. It looks vertically compressed and somewhat skew. The proportions in e.g. this photo gives the impression of a more pointed geometry. Otherwise a very idyllic scene, although it appears a tad oversaturated. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would support, but you need to provide image without issue for FP. Despite many requests, and not only from me, none of them has a color space. - Benh (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I already mentioned in many of this cases: I don't understand your point. I never cut of the color space of the images. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It misses the "scale reference" for color. If you don't mind sharing details of your workflow, I'd be happy to help checking. - Benh (talk) 06:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated and, as mentioned, the composition isn't ideal. — Julian H.^✈ 17:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Colours look too saturated, but how do I know what they should be as all the numbers in this JPG lack any scale. If this image was an encyclopaedia, it would be like all the mountains and rivers were measured 1045, 645, 236, etc, without metres or feet. Commons:Image guidelines, which is what FP is tested against, requires the EXIF define the colourspace, preferably sRGB. -- Colin (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]