Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sun rays at Hopi Point Grand Canyon 2013.jpg

File:Sun rays at Hopi Point Grand Canyon 2013.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2013 at 15:44:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! -- Arcalino (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I preferred the previous nominations for two reasons: This one is fully backlit with the negative effects of that (clipping, high sky-ground-contrast with low inter-ground-contrast) and the composition, in my opinion, leads to an area on the right of which not enough is visible. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Julian, I've worked on the sky (selective NR) and applied some masked sharpening. Do you think it is better now? For sure it is a backlit situation but I do not see real clipping. Backlit is the only way to bring out the nice sun rays inside the Canyon. Just to avoid confusion: The other noms of the Grand Canyon show a very different motive thus they are not really comparable to the one here.
  I hope Alex Florstein, Christian Ferrer, Ivar, Arcalino, Böhringer and Martin Falbisoner are still fine with this image. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Did you also work on the wb? Anway, I like the current version even better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Not on the global WB. I made slight corrections on the sky - a very light local gradient organge filter to let the sky look more than it was on location. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's definitely clipped, just not at 100% but at 94.73%, but that doesn't look too different. I'll stick with neutral - I guess this will easily be FP without my support anyway. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:30, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light. Oh, the light. Pleclown (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The battered Sky is a pity but the mood is absolutely great.  Richard  [®]  18:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it! It's good!--XRay ^talk 19:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image-Godot13 (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Request A very nice view, but I'm missing the main informations: is it a HDR-image (from how much images 3,5,7, ..., properties: exposure, aperture, ...) or not ... ??? It will be good to add the relevant informations to the image. I do it as an important info for all other photographers! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the hint - the information is useful, for sure. I will add this information later on today. IMHO the name of the template Panorama is a bit unfortunate, but this template is still up to date also for HDR? I've used it e.g. here? --Tuxyso (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - A {{Retouched}} template can be used too. I did it here: here: Lake Bondhus or better and similar here: Crepuscular rays in Namibia. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done Information added. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - . Perfect, thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
now Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support for a change in the FP theme, and per Pleclown. J Kadavoor J e e 02:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 13:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support M49314 (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /J Kadavoor J e e 03:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural