Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Suzhou canals November 2017 003.jpg
File:Suzhou canals November 2017 003.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2021 at 04:30:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#China
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)- Support --Steven Sun (talk) 07:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but I don't see anything special,sorry --Commonists 16:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Nice view. With a slightly different editing and crop, this would look better IMO. Just a thought. (No color change, just light- and exposure-related sliders tweaked) --Cart (talk) 19:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is usually more color hidden in very white or black areas than you might think. I have made screenshots of the Lightroom edits. General settings plus a few gradient filters to tone down some bright areas and give the water an extra boost. My settings are in Swedish, but I think you can figure them out anyway since the order of LR functions is the same. Keep in mind that values work a bit differently when editing a jpeg vs the raw. --Cart (talk) 08:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good, but I need something (like a cloud) in the upper right corner for the composition to be fully satisfying to me. Could be an excellent VI with the name of the canal identified in the scope, though, and definitely a superior QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose I was OK with it at first but now, having seen Cart's edit, I'd like to see that one nominated instead. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, too ordinary --RolfHill (talk) 08:53, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
