Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg

File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2014 at 06:03:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --I would like to take credit for this nom. Seems JJ Harrision's works are a safe bet at FPC. :) Nikhil (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He has 300+ EN FPs; almost 9% of all the FPs there (per his own words). Honestly there is not much fun in re-reviewing them all here. (Excellent work, as usual.) J e e 06:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At least three pictures of his show up as picture of the day on en:wiki every month. Nikhil (talk) 06:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but these are useless comments: I don't know what happens in ENWP, and I don't care. Is this an attempt to influence voters ? I know that it is not the case, but it could be. Please, stop to reference to ENWP, here we are on "Commons"...--Jebulon (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed. –Makele-90 (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Makele-90 and this is not the standard I would have expected from JJ. :( Lack of detail on the wings due to the overexposure. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Uoaei1 (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expo seems ok IMO --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I can see fine detail of the feathers even in the whitest part of the bird. It's a rather clean bird, but I doubt it is overexposed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it look like overexposed and washed out colors. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Saffron. No overexposure, white is white, and details of feathers are visible. The sharpness of the beak-to-neck part is outstanding, IMO. And seven against three !--Jebulon (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J e e 17:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds